The following is slightly adapted from an article called The Sabbath in the Greek – Use and Meaning of “Sabbaton” (Bible Students’ Library, No. 154) that was written early in the 20th century, and published by Pacific Press.
Use and Meaning of “Sabbaton” (σάββατον)
The Sabbath question is before the world. Men can not cry it down. Over that question Christendom is divided into three different classes:
- Observers of the first day, believing it to be sacred.
- Observers of the seventh day, according to the plain letter of the Bible.
- Those who believe in no Sabbath, but generally observe the first day of the week.
Observers of the first day present various arguments to prove its sacredness and obligation. Many of these men frankly concede that there is no scripture proof of its sacredness other than inference and questionable example. If it could be shown from the New Testament that the first day is called the Sabbath by inspiration, it would be good evidence to show that it is a divine institution, and that its observance as such rests upon moral obligation.
If we turn to the English versions of the Scriptures, we find nothing which even appears to recognize the first day of the septenary cycle as the Sabbath. Presumably, this should be conclusive; for the New Testament was translated by learned and devout Christian men, who were, generally speaking, all first-day observers. But they render quite uniformly all the passages where that day is referred to. Yet there are those who contend that Matt. 28:1 in the Greek clearly teaches that the first day is the Sabbath.
Below we give the Greek of that passage, a transliteration into English, and a word for word translation into English:
“Opse de sabbaton, te epiphoskouse eis mian sabbaton.”
“Late but of the Sabbath, it beginning to dawn into the first of the week.”
A Modern Rendering
This passage is rendered by some first-day advocates, “At the end of Sabbaths as it began to dawn toward the first of the Sabbaths. ” It is held that the first Sabbath (Greek Sabbaton) refers to the seventh-day Sabbath, while the last expression mian sabbaton means “the first of the Sabbaths,” or the first day of the week. Is this true? Let us examine the terms and text.
- The word sabbaton is the Greek form of the Hebrew word shabbath.
- That word was used not only to designate the last day of the week, but the whole weekly cycle as well, because the week owes its origin and continued existence to the Sabbath alone. Therefore, as the Sabbath marked the crowning day of the week, it was the most natural thing to call the “sabbatical period” by the same name. This the Hebrews did. Therefore the Greek lexicons, of Liddell and Scott, Greenfield, Nestle,and Weidner, Bagster, Robinson, Pickering, etc., give as one of the definitions of the Greek word “a week,” period of seven days. So also Gesenius defines shabbath in one of his definitions, as “week.” Lightfoot, in a comment on Matt. 2S:1 says:
“The Jews reckon the days of the week thus: One day (or the first day) of the Sabbath, Two (or second day) of the Sabbath [etc.] . . . Ezra ordained that they should read the Law publicly on the second and fifth days of the Sabbath, etc.,” meaning, of course, the second and fifth days of the week.
The Sehaff-Herzog “Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge,” article “Week,” says:
“The Greeks and Romans first became acquainted with the seven-day week through Christianity and the scattered Jews. [The Romans adopted it after the reign of Theodosius.] The expression hebdomas is not found in the New Testament, but rather sabbaton (e. g., Luke 18:12) or sabbata (e. g., Matt. 28:1), used, however, in the sense of it [hebdomas], as, in the Old Testament, shabbath [sabbath], is parallel with shabua [week] (c/. Lev. 23:15; Deut. 16:0).”
- The use of the word elsewhere in the New Testament clearly shows that one of its distinctive meaning is “week.” See Luke 18:12, where the Pharisee boasts that he fasts “twice in the week” ( sabbaton). It would be absurd to say, I fast twice on a Sabbath day.
- But why may we not render Matt 28: 1 , cis mian sabbaton, “the first of the sabbaths”?—Because the construction of the Greek forbids it. Of nouns in the Greek, the gender, number, and relationship must be shown. These points are determined by the cases, of which there are five, —nominative, genitive, dative, accusative, and vocative.- And all these particulars are indicated by a change in the form, or in the termination of the words. The subject of a finite verb, is, of course, put in the nominative ease. If the relationship is such as would be denoted in English by the word “of,” the noun would change its form to the genitive case. Thus, what we would call in English “the man’s book,” would be in Greek, literally, “the book of the man,” the word “man” being put in the genitive case. Adjectives must agree with their nouns in gender, number, and ease; and these particulars are indicated in adjectives, the same as in nouns, by a change in the form or termination of the word. The word sabbaton is used in the New Testament both in the singular and the plural, the plural signifying generally the same as the singular. It has a plural signification only in Acts 17:2, where it refers to a number of sabbaths; and in Col. 2:16, where it refers to the seven yearly or ceremonial sabbaths of the Jewish system. The word sabbaton is of the neuter gender.
Reasons for the Common Rendering
Having noted well these facts, let us mark their application in the expression “first day of the week” as found in the eight passages in the New Testament: Matt 28 :1; Mark 16: 2, 9; Luke 24:1; John 20:1, 19; Acts 20:7; 1 Cor. 16:2. The construction of each of these passages is exactly the same; and hence the explanation of one will be the explanation of them all. As the first instance is that of Matt. 28:1, we will take that as the sample. But the query may arise:
If sabbaton in the first instance is rendered “Sabbath”, referring to the seventh day, why should the same word, in the same form, in the second instance, be rendered “week,” referring to all the seven days?
The reason is that the word in the last instance is preceded by the numeral adjective mian; and the lexicons tell us that always when the word sabbaton follows such adjectives, it means week, the adjective specifying the day of the week, as the first, second, etc.. Thus it is easily and absolutely determined when to render the word sabbaton “Sabbath,” and when “week.” Whenever it is preceded by a numeral adjective, as it is in all the eight texts above referred to, it means “week.”
But why should the word “day” be supplied, making the passage read “first day of the week”?
It is because the numeral adjective mian is there, and it must agree with some noun either expressed or understood; But there is no such noun expressed; therefore we must search to see what noun can be understood. Let us then examine this numeral adjective, mian. It is from the first of the cardinal numbers, heis meaning “one,” but here, by a Hebraism, used for the ordinal “first.”
“We here present the word in its different genders, and follow its declension till we find the form before us. Adjectives are declined like nouns:
We here find the form, mian, for which we are seeking. It is in the feminine gender, singular number, and accusative case. In the sentence (page 2) it is the object after the preposition cis. There must be some noun in the same gender , number, and case, with which it agrees. Why may it not agree with sabbaton, and be rendered “first sabbath,” referring to Sunday, as the novice claims?—Because sabbaton is in the neuter gender, plural number in this instance, and genitive case. There is not a single point of agreement. Neither ean the word “sabbath” be supplied, so as to make it read “the first (sabbath) of (a new series of) sabbaths,” as they again contend ; for mian and sabbaton do not agree in a single point. Nor can they render it “the first of the sabbath,” referring to Sunday, or any other single day; for that would be nonsense. What is expressed is ”first of the week”, but whenever a division of the week is spoken of, it must refer to its days. “Day” is therefore the word to be supplied. The Greek for day is hemera, a noun of the feminine gender; and we have but to put it in the singular number and accusative case, which would be hemeran , to make the agreement between it and mian complete. Then we have cis mian (hemeran) sabbaton, “to [or toward] the first (day) of the week”—as definite an expression as language can form.
The words, opse do (page 2), translated in the common version “in the end,” do not signify that one class of sabbaths (the seventh day) there came to an end, opening the way for another class of sabbaths (the first day) to be introduced, as some would have us believe. The word opse is an adverb, meaning, literally, “late;” but it is a word which the Greeks used with reference to that which was past. See all the lexicons with their quotations from classical Greek. Thus, “late of the day,” or “on the day,” signified, “when the day was past,” “late of the Sabbath,” “when the Sabbath was past.”
Testimony of Scholars
We present in the same line the candid treatment of this disputed text by Dr. Walter Quincy Scott, one of the instructors in the Bible Teachers’ Training-School of New York City, and an observer of the first day of the week. In the January (1905) number of The Bible Record, published by the training-school, there appeared the following question:
“Is it allowable to translate the Greek of Matt. 28:1, ‘At the end of the Sabbaths, as it began to dawn towards the first of the Sabbaths’?”
In reply to this question, Dr. Scott addressed the following letter to Dr. W. W. White, the editor of The Bible Record:
“New York, Sept. 8, 1904.
My dear Dr. White:
Your correspondent asks, ‘Is it allowable to translate the Greek of Matt. 28:1 [the Greek text is here inserted], ‘At the end of the Sabbaths, as it began to dawn towards the first of the Sabbaths’?
Such a rendering is impossible.
- Mian is feminine, and sabbaton is neuter. Mian agrees with hemeran understood. Your inquirer remarks on this point (as made by writer in Sunday School Times), ‘Neither do they [mian and sabbaton] agree in number. Of course not; a substantive followed by a partitive genitive cannot agree with it numerically.
- It seems idle to add anything to the foregoing grammatical prohibition of the rendering proposed. But I may add that mian sabbaton is a Hebraism corresponding to the rabbinical designation of the days of the week. They called each day of the festal week a ‘Sabbath,’ and indicated each day by its proper ordinal prefixed to ‘Sabbath’.
And in Greek eis is commonly used (as here) instead of protos.
LXX and N. T. alike use ta Sabbata in sense of singular —‘the Sabbath day’ and also in the meaning ‘week.’ Mian sabbaton in Matt. 28:1 can not mean anything else than ‘first day of the week’. 5 The R. V. correctly translates the verse.
Your correspondent will find ample scholarly notes in Lange’s Matthew, by Schaff.
Yours very truly,
Walter Quiney Scott.
In the May number of the Record there appeared another letter upon this subject, from which we take the following:
“Editor of The Bible Record.
The query in the issue of January, 1905, as to ‘Sabbath or Sabbaths’ seems to call for further warning. The querist asks if in Matt. 28:1, Opse de sabbaton, te epiphoskouse eis mian sabbaton, may not be rendered: At the end of the [Jewish seventh-day] Sabbaths, as it began to dawn toward the first of the [Christian first-day] Sabbaths. The superb negative answer given should be heralded far and wide.
People of excellent intention and deep piety, but with little knowledge, are making such an interpretation, in fortifying themselves against ‘Saturday-keepers’. I own two books, and have read two others, in which each writer claims to have made the great discovery of said translation, and has based his book thereon.
These good men had only a rusted smattering of classical Greek, and in their zeal without knowledge they stumbled upon this rendering, with a carelessness that few students of a month would make. ‘A little learning is a dangerous thing’. And more than that, acquaintance with classical Greek is not enough for the reading of the New Testament Greek. One must have large acquaintance with the grammar and lexicon of the Greek Old Testament, and behind that, as the key to many of its peculiarities and mysteries, of the Hebrew Old Testament also. “
This letter is written by a professor in a theological seminary, but his name is not given. No person of acknowledged scholarship is ever found claiming as a just criticism on the Greek construction, that Sunday is called the Sabbath in the Greek; and the criticism herein set forth would not be demanded did not some theological novice, taking counsel of his ignorance, occasionally put forth the claim, and thus confuse the minds of those not acquainted with the Greek. It is hoped that this explanation will be sufficient to show such teachers the folly of their course; or, if this may not be, that it will enable every English reader to see why he should reject the groundless claim, and to know for himself that Sunday is never called the Sabbath in the New Testament, either in the English or the Greek. To take the position it is, is to set aside the meaning of the Hebrew terms for more than two millenniums; is to ignore the testimony of the Syriac and Latin versions; is to charge all the learned translators of the Greek New Testament into English with unpardonable ignorance or dishonesty. Our readers may safely rely upon our English versions.